Risk conditions in healthcare workers of a pediatric COVID center in Mexico City / Condiciones de riesgo en el personal de salud de un centro COVID pediátrico de la Ciudad de México

Abstract Background: The new evere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is characterized by its high capacity to transmit. Health-care personnel is highly susceptible to becoming infected. This study aimed to determine the characteristics and known risk factors for contagion and severe outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 disease in health-care personnel of a pediatric coronavirus disease (COVID) center in Mexico City. Methods: In the last week of March 2020 (at the beginning of phase 2 of the Ministry of Health's national campaign in Mexico), a study was conducted on healthcare workers of a pediatric COVID hospital in Mexico City. Using a virtual interview, we evaluated comorbidities, mobility, areas and functions where they carry out the activities, protection measures, contact history, and vaccination. According to their activities, healthcare workers were classified into the following areas: medical, nursing, other health-care personnel (researchers, nutritionists, rehabilitation, imaging, and laboratory), administrative, and other services. We compared the variables between the groups of healthcare workers with the X2 test. Results: We included 812 participants. The mean age was 41 ± 11 years, and 33% were overweight or obese, 18% were over 60 years old, and 19% had high blood pressure. Medical and nursing personnel presented a higher proportion in the use of standard protection measures. Conclusions: Among healthcare workers, there are risk conditions for the development of complications in case of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most medical and nursing personnel use standard protective measures.

Resumen Introducción: La pandemia por el nuevo coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2) se caracteriza por su alta capacidad de transmitirse, por lo que el personal de salud es muy susceptible de contagiarse. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar las características y los factores de riesgo conocidos para el contagio y los desenlaces graves de la enfermedad por SARS-CoV-2 en personal de salud de un centro COVID pediátrico de la Ciudad de México. Método: La última semana de marzo de 2020 (al inicio de la fase 2 de la campaña nacional por coronavirus en México) se realizó un estudio en los trabajadores de la salud de un hospital COVID pediátrico de la Ciudad de México. Mediante una entrevista virtual se evaluaron comorbilidad, movilidad, área y funciones donde se desempeñan las actividades laborales, medidas de protección, antecedentes de contactos y vacunación. Los participantes fueron clasificados en las siguientes áreas: personal médico, enfermería, otro personal de salud (investigadores, nutriólogos, rehabilitación, imagenología, laboratorio), administrativo y otros servicios. Se realizaron comparaciones de las variables con prueba de X2 entre los grupos de trabajadores de la salud Resultados: Se incluyeron 812 participantes. El 33% presentó sobrepeso u obesidad, el 18% eran mayores de 60 años y el 19% tenía hipertensión arterial. El personal médico y de enfermería mostró una mayor proporción de uso de medidas de protección estándar. Conclusiones: Existen condiciones de riesgo para el desarrollo de complicaciones en los trabajadores de la salud en caso de contagio con SARS-CoV-2. La mayoría del personal médico y de enfermería utiliza las medidas de protección estándar.

Confiabilidad de la detección de problemas de desarrollo mediante el semáforo de la prueba de Evaluación del Desarrollo Infantil: ¿es diferente un resultado amarillo de uno rojo? / Reliability for detection of developmental problems using the semaphore from the Child Development Evaluation test: Is a yellow result different from a red result?

Introducción: La prueba Evaluación del Desarrollo Infantil (EDI) es un instrumento de tamizaje de problemas en el desarrollo diseñado y validado en México. La calificación obtenida se expresa como semáforo. Se consideran positivos tanto el resultado amarillo como el rojo, aunque se plantea una intervención diferente para cada uno. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la capacidad de la prueba EDI para discriminar entre los niños identificados con semáforo amarillo y los identificados con rojo al compararse con el Inventario de Desarrollo de Battelle 2.ª edición (IDB-2) en cuanto al cociente de desarrollo del dominio (CDD). Métodos: El análisis se llevó a cabo utilizando la información obtenida para el estudio de la validación. Se excluyeron los pacientes con resultado normal (verde) en EDI. Se utilizaron 2 puntos de CDD (IDB-2) por dominio: < 90 para incluir normal-bajo y < 80 para diagnóstico de retraso. Se analizó el resultado con base en la correlación del resultado del semáforo de EDI (amarillo o rojo) y el IDB-2, total y por subgrupos de edad. Resultados: Al considerar un CDD < 90 en amarillo, el 86.8% tuvo al menos un dominio afectado, y el 50%, 3 o más dominios, en comparación con el 93.8% y el 78.8% para el resultado en rojo, respectivamente. Hubo diferencias en todos los dominios entre amarillos y rojos (p < 0.001) para el porcentaje de niños con un CDD < 80: cognitivo (36.1 vs. 61.9%); comunicación (27.8 vs. 50.4%); motor (18.1 vs. 39.9%); personal-social (20.1 vs. 28.9%); y adaptativo (6.9 vs. 20.4%). Conclusiones: Los resultados de semáforo (amarillo o rojo) permiten identificar diferente magnitud de los problemas en el desarrollo y apoyan intervenciones diferenciadas.

Background: The Child Development Evaluation (CDE) is a screening tool designed and validated in Mexico for detecting developmental problems. The result is expressed through a semaphore. In the CDE test, both yellow and red results are considered positive, although a different intervention is proposed for each. The aim of this work was to evaluate the reliability of the CDE test to discriminate between children with yellow/red result based on the developmental domain quotient (DDQ) obtained through the Battelle Development Inventory, 2nd edition (in Spanish) (BDI-2). Methods: The information was obtained for the study from the validation. Children with a normal (green) result in the CDE were excluded. Two different cut-off points of the DDQ were used (BDI-2): < 90 to include low average, and developmental delay was considered with a cut-off < 80 per domain. Results were analyzed based on the correlation of the CDE test and each domain from the BDI-2 and by subgroups of age. Results: With a cut-off DDQ <90, 86.8% of tests with yellow result (CDE) indicated at least one domain affected and 50% 3 or more compared with 93.8% and 78.8% for red result, respectively. There were differences in every domain (P < 0.001) for the percent of children with DDQ < 80 between yellow and red result (CDE): cognitive 36.1% vs. 61.9%; communication: 27.8% vs. 50.4%, motor: 18.1% vs. 39.9%; personal-social: 20.1% vs. 28.9%; and adaptive: 6.9% vs. 20.4%. Conclusions: The semaphore result yellow/red allows identifying different magnitudes of delay in developmental domains or subdomains, supporting the recommendation of different interventions for each one.

Child Development Evaluation Test analysis by field improves detection of developmental problems in children

Background: The Child Development Evaluation (CDE) Test is a screening instrument for developmental problems. In the validation study, a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 61% were reported, considering a cut-off value for both a total development quotient (TDQ) of 90. Given that the TDQ is obtained by calculation of the five evaluated fields in the Battelle Development Inventory, 2nd edition (BDI-2), it may occur that a child is classified as a false positive (TDQ ≥90) and may have a developmental delay in at least one of the fields (true positive). The objective of this work was to evaluate if the properties of the CDE Test are different when analyzing each field for the probability of a developmental delay. Methods: The information obtained for the study from the validation (Rizzoli-Córdoba, 2013) was analyzed. In the CDE Test, a true positive was considered when the result was yellow or red. A developmental delay was considered per domain with a scale score <80 in the BDI-2. The results were analyzed based on the correlation of what was evaluated between the CDE Test and the BDI-2. Results: For 438 children of 1- to 60-months of age, sensitivity (S) and specificity (Sp) per field were as follows: a) Motor: S=84.3% and Sp=87%; b) Communication: S=79.5% and Sp=79.4%; c) Personal-Social: S=86.9% and Sp=85%; d) Adaptive: S=91.7% and Sp=85.1%; and e) Cognitive: S=83.6% and Sp=88.8%. Conclusions: When analyzing each field separately, better scores for the CDE are observed compared with those reported for the TDQ in both sensitivity and specificity.